4530.0 - Crime Victimisation, Australia, 2013-14 Quality Declaration 
ARCHIVED ISSUE Released at 11:30 AM (CANBERRA TIME) 17/02/2015   
   Page tools: Print Print Page Print all pages in this productPrint All

OTHER THEFT Endnote 1

WHAT IS OTHER THEFT?

In this survey, other theft is defined as the unlawful taking of money or goods owned by a household member (other than from motor vehicles owned by a household member) with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the money or goods, without the use, or threat, of force or violence, coercion or deception. It includes:

    • Property belonging to a member of the household not covered by the other types of crime included in the survey
    • Property belonging to a household member stolen from a vehicle not owned by a household member
    • Property stolen from a yard or garden (e.g. statues or plants).

Other theft excludes any incidents involving theft covered in other crime types in the survey (e.g. break-in or robbery).

Other theft is considered to be a household crime for the purpose of this survey.


VICTIMISATION AND REPORTING RATES FOR 2013-14 (Table 1)

In the 12 months prior to interview in 2013-14, an estimated 238,800 households (2.7% of all households) experienced at least one incident of other theft. Almost two-fifths of all households (39%) that experienced other theft reported the most recent incident to police.


CHARACTERISTICS OF OTHER THEFT INCIDENTS (Table 25)

This section discusses characteristics of the most recent incident for households that were victims of other theft in the 12 months prior to interview.

In the most recent incident of other theft experienced by households:

    • 47,200 households, or one in five (20%) victims had personal items stolen. A further 17% of households (or 41,400 households) that experienced other theft had outdoor/garden items stolen
    • The most common location for other theft was the victim's home (54% of household victims, or 129,100 households), followed by the victim's work (11% of household victims, or 25,800 households)
    • Just under a third of all households that were a victim of other theft (31%) did not report the most recent incident to police due to the incident being seen as too trivial or unimportant. This was the most common main reason the most recent incident was not reported to police. A further 14% did not report the most recent incident to police due to a belief that there was nothing that the police could do.


ENDNOTE

Endnote 1 All comparisons discussed have been tested for statistical significance with a 95% level of confidence that there is a real difference in the two populations being tested. Only data with a relative standard error (RSE) of less than 25% is referred to in the text of this publication and these estimates are considered sufficiently reliable for general use. To determine whether there is a statistical difference between any other two estimates, significance testing should be undertaken. For further information, refer to the Technical Note.